Receive
Readers submit corrections, missing records, or methodological concerns to corrections@infrastructureevidence.com.
04 / CONFLICTS + CORRECTIONS
Accuracy matters more than preserving earlier language.
We disclose material conflicts, protect editorial control, preserve publication history, and visibly correct meaningful errors.
CONFLICTS + FUNDING
Relationships that could influence an investigation must be visible.
Researchers disclose relevant compensation, gifts, investments, contracts, family relationships, political roles, and advocacy affiliations. A direct financial interest may require recusal or visible disclosure.
Client-funded work identifies the funder and preserves our control over methods, findings, and publication language. If independence cannot be protected, the assignment is declined or terminated.
CORRECTIONS PROCESS
A documented path from concern to resolution.
Assess
Credible requests are logged and tested against the underlying evidence.
Correct
Material factual changes receive a visible note explaining what changed and why.
Preserve
Superseded versions and rejected requests are retained internally with the supporting rationale.
PUBLICATION SAFEGUARDS
Before a major report is final.
01Material claims identify a source, responsible party, time period, and appropriate qualification.
02One-time proceeds, projected revenue, recurring revenue, abatements, and public costs remain distinct.
03Design commitments are not presented as measured operating performance.
04Administrative milestones are not called final approval unless the governing authority confirms it.
05Charts identify units, assumptions, timeframes, and limitations.
06Major publications receive a source audit, plain-language review, conflict check, and correction path.